Biden’s U.N. Proposal for Africa Raises Veto Power Questions and Tensions

Person in a suit with a serious expression.

President Biden’s proposal to add African nations to the U.N. Security Council sparks debate over veto power and global representation.

At a Glance

U.S. supports adding two permanent seats for African countries on the U.N. Security Council
Proposal does not include veto power for new African seats
Critics argue lack of veto power undermines reform’s impact
Debate highlights broader geopolitical tensions and need for U.N. reform

Biden Administration Pushes for U.N. Security Council Expansion

In a significant move during this week’s U.N. meetings in New York, the Biden administration endorsed the addition of two permanent seats for African nations on the U.N. Security Council. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield announced the proposal, following up on President Joe Biden’s earlier support for expanding the Council to better reflect the modern world order.

The current structure of the Security Council, unchanged since 1945, consists of five permanent members with veto power (U.S., Russia, China, Britain, and France) and ten non-permanent members. Africa currently holds three non-permanent seats, which the U.S. argues is insufficient for African countries to fully contribute to global decision-making.

On @UN Security Council membership proposal for #Africa made by @USAmbUN but w/no veto — @HEDrArikana Chihombori has some very strong words and sees the offer as real disrespect towards Africa. @ADDIMovement @AJEnglish #TheBottomLine
Watch here. https://t.co/mk7uULY6R2

— Steve Clemons (@SCClemons) September 25, 2024

Controversy Over Veto Power

While the proposal aims to increase African representation, it notably excludes veto power for the new permanent seats. This omission has sparked criticism from various quarters, including African analysts who argue that without veto rights, the reform lacks substantive impact.

“That is why, in addition to non-permanent membership for African countries, the United States supports creating two permanent seats for Africa on the council,” Thomas-Greenfield said. “It’s what our African partners seek, and it’s what we believe is just.”

The U.S. justifies this stance by citing concerns that additional veto powers could further paralyze the Council’s ability to act on critical issues. Recent examples of veto power hampering Council action include Russia’s blockade on Ukraine-related matters and U.S. support for Israel limiting responses to the Gaza conflict.

Geopolitical Implications and Challenges

The proposal sheds light on broader geopolitical frictions between East and West. China, positioning itself as a strong supporter of the Global South, may view the U.S. initiative with skepticism. Russia is likely to oppose any changes that could potentially diminish its influence within the Council.

“We have been campaigning and the concept has been accepted and of course Africa continues to play through various countries on the continent, important roles, peacekeeping missions not only on our continent but around the world. So, we [have] got the capability, we know how and Africa needs to be given its rightful place in the UN system and its various structures.” Cyril Ramaphosa told the media.

Reforming the Security Council is a complex undertaking that requires amending the U.N. Charter, a process that can be vetoed by any of the current permanent members. This presents a significant hurdle to implementing meaningful change, as member states remain divided on issues such as the future of the veto and fair apportionment of seats in an expanded Council.

The Biden administration has announced plans to expand the influential United Nations Security Council by adding two permanent seats for African nations. https://t.co/9j2DY4mylb

— ABC News (@ABC) September 13, 2024

Looking Ahead: Potential for Reform

Despite the challenges, there is broad agreement that the Security Council needs reform to maintain its relevance in a rapidly changing world. Creative solutions proposed by experts include allowing permanent members to vote “no” without vetoing and creating a rotating pool of countries for Council membership.

“The U.N. needs to adapt to bring in new voices and new perspectives,” he said. “That’s why we support reforming and expanding the membership of the U.N. Security Council.”

As the debate continues, it’s clear that the path to reform will require significant diplomatic effort and compromise. The countries demonstrating creativity and political will in this process will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future international order. For now, the U.S. proposal serves as a starting point for what promises to be a long and complex negotiation over the future of global governance.