Trump Revokes Biden’s Arms Policy: Implications for International Security and Human Rights

Man gesturing while speaking at a podium outside

Trump revokes Biden’s arms policy, sparking debate on international security and human rights.

Quick Takes

Trump administration repeals Biden-era regulation restricting U.S. arms transfers
Biden’s policy required recipients to provide written assurances of compliance with international law
Move criticized by some lawmakers, praised by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu
Concerns raised about potential misuse of American arms in alleged human rights abuses
Trump administration reportedly working to eliminate Pentagon office focused on preventing civilian deaths

Trump Rescinds Biden’s Arms Policy

The Trump administration has taken a significant step in reshaping U.S. foreign policy by rescinding a Biden-era regulation that placed restrictions on the transfer of American arms to foreign countries. This policy, known as National Security Memorandum (NSM-20), required recipients of U.S. weapons to provide written assurances that they would comply with international law in their use. The reversal has ignited a fierce debate on the balance between supporting allies and ensuring responsible arms trade practices.

The policy change was announced through a February 21 order from National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, effectively canceling the previous administration’s directive. This move has been met with mixed reactions from lawmakers and international observers, with some praising it as a step towards strengthening diplomatic ties, while others express concern over potential human rights implications.

Trump rescinds Biden policy meant to block U.S. arms from being used in war crimes https://t.co/t2olFgeWR4

— The Independent (@Independent) February 24, 2025

Impact on U.S.-Israel Relations

The repeal of NSM-20 has particularly significant implications for U.S.-Israel relations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had previously criticized the Biden administration for what he perceived as withholding weapons from Israel during its ongoing conflict with Hamas. The Trump administration’s decision to lift these restrictions has been warmly received by Netanyahu, who praised President Trump for his support.

“Thank you President Trump for keeping your promise to give Israel the tools it needs to defend itself, to confront our common enemies and to secure a future of peace and prosperity” – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

The policy shift comes at a time when Israel has been under scrutiny for its military actions in Gaza. Despite existing human rights policies, Israel received $18 billion in U.S. aid during its conflict with Hamas. The Trump administration’s move is expected to further solidify support for Israel, even as allegations of human rights violations continue to circulate.

The Trump administration has revoked a Biden-era policy that required US allies to ensure American weapons were not used in violations of international law, reported the Washington Post. https://t.co/yr4ubvdGV3

— Quds News Network (@QudsNen) February 24, 2025

Concerns Over Human Rights and Civilian Protection

Critics of the policy reversal, including Senator Chris Van Hollen, argue that it undermines American values and taxpayers’ rights. There are growing concerns about the potential misuse of American arms in regions of conflict, particularly in light of alleged human rights abuses. The Trump administration’s reported efforts to eliminate a Pentagon office focused on preventing civilian deaths have further intensified these worries.

“That makes those who orchestrate it war criminals. So now the question is, what will the United States do?” – Sen. Chris Van Hollen

While President Biden had supported Israel’s military efforts, he also expressed concerns over civilian casualties. The Trump administration’s approach appears to prioritize strategic alliances over human rights considerations, a stance that has drawn both praise and criticism from various quarters.

Looking Ahead

As tensions in the Middle East remain high, the long-term implications of this policy shift are yet to be fully understood. The reversal of NSM-20 raises questions about the future of U.S. arms sales policies and their impact on international security and human rights. With the potential for increased scrutiny from human rights organizations and some lawmakers, the debate over responsible arms trade practices is likely to continue in the coming months and years.