
Judge blasts Apple CEO Tim Cook for deliberately disobeying court order and allowing executives to lie under oath in the ongoing Epic Games legal battle that could revolutionize how all App Store developers operate.
Key Takeaways
- U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has ordered Apple to explain its failure to comply with a 2021 antitrust injunction that required allowing developers to include external payment links.
- The judge specifically criticized Apple CEO Tim Cook for ignoring internal legal advice to comply with the court order.
- Apple’s vice president of finance, Alex Roman, was accused of lying under oath during trial proceedings.
- Apple has blocked Epic Games attempts to return Fortnite to iOS platforms worldwide, claiming Epic breached developer agreements.
- Apple must respond to Epic’s motion by Wednesday, with a court hearing scheduled for May 27 if the matter remains unresolved.
Apple’s Executive Leadership Under Fire
In an unprecedented judicial rebuke, Apple CEO Tim Cook and his executive team are facing serious allegations of deliberately violating a federal court order in their ongoing dispute with Epic Games. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has demanded Apple provide a comprehensive explanation for its failure to comply with a 2021 antitrust injunction that required the tech giant to ease App Store restrictions and allow developers to direct users to alternative payment methods outside Apple’s ecosystem.
The judge’s criticism extends beyond mere non-compliance, directly accusing Cook of ignoring recommendations from Apple’s own legal team to adhere to the court’s ruling. Even more damning, Apple’s vice president of finance, Alex Roman, has been accused of providing false testimony under oath during the original trial proceedings. These accusations represent a significant escalation in the long-running legal battle between the tech giant and the Fortnite creator.
Epic’s Struggle to Return Fortnite to iOS
The core of this dispute involves Epic’s repeated attempts to bring Fortnite back to Apple’s platforms. Despite the 2021 court ruling and new EU regulations designed to open digital marketplaces, Apple has consistently blocked Epic’s submissions. The consequences for gamers have been significant, with Epic confirming that “Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it,” according to a statement from the company.
“Yesterday afternoon, Apple broke its week-long silence on the status of our app review with a letter saying they will not act on the Fortnite app submission until the Ninth Circuit Court rules on the partial stay. We believe this violates the Court’s Injunction and we have filed a second Motion to Enforce Injunction with the US District Court for the Northern District of California,” Epic Games stated.
Epic claims Apple is using its app review process and notarization requirements as mechanisms to circumvent both the court’s injunction and the EU’s Digital Markets Act. Apple’s demand that Epic submit separate versions of Fortnite for different regions has been particularly contentious, with Epic arguing this requirement contradicts Apple’s own guidelines and represents retaliatory behavior against a company challenging its market dominance.
Apple’s Legal Justification
Apple maintains its position is legally sound, arguing that Epic breached its Developer Program License Agreement (DPLA), which it claims justifies both the removal of Fortnite and the termination of Epic’s developer account. The tech giant has remained steadfast in its stance despite mounting legal pressure, setting the stage for a potentially consequential showdown in court that could reshape the digital marketplace landscape.
“The parties’ recent disputes over the District Court’s injunction do not diminish Apple’s bases and legal right to have terminated Epic Games DPLA. To the contrary, the District Court’s recent Order reiterated Epic Games’ admission that it breached the DPLA and [had previously] conceded that Apple would be entitled to relief if the Court found that the DPLA was enforceable and did not violate antitrust laws or public policy,” Apple stated in its defense.
Looming Legal Showdown
With Apple ordered to respond to Epic’s motion by Wednesday and a court hearing scheduled for May 27 if the matter remains unresolved, the stakes couldn’t be higher. A ruling against Apple could fundamentally transform how the App Store operates, potentially ending the company’s ability to extract its 30% commission on all in-app purchases. For conservative consumers frustrated with big tech’s unchecked power and monopolistic behaviors, this case represents a rare instance where the judicial system appears poised to hold a tech giant accountable.
The origins of this legal battle trace back to 2020, when Epic deliberately violated Apple’s rules by implementing its own payment system in Fortnite, bypassing Apple’s commission structure. While Epic’s 2021 victory was partial, the current enforcement action could have far more significant implications for developers and consumers alike. As President Trump has consistently advocated for breaking up tech monopolies, this case aligns with broader conservative concerns about the unchecked power of Silicon Valley giants.